Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Clara Rosemarda
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Jayjg (talk) 02:37, 1 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Clara Rosemarda (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Unreferenced WP:BLP, Notability not asserted - the Sonoma County Artists Awards Program in Literary Arts isn't a notable award of itself. MuffledThud (talk) 13:21, 26 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. —MuffledThud (talk) 13:21, 26 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. —MuffledThud (talk) 13:21, 26 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- delete, searches produce no evidence of notability. Was prodded but the article creator removed that. Nomoskedasticity (talk) 13:30, 26 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. GS turns up almost nothing – the one interesting hit is for this book, but when you check, you find the subject is not actually the author, but rather is one name in a long list of people that are acknowledged "for general support and assistance". None of the other claims are sourced. Respectfully, Agricola44 (talk) 15:07, 26 October 2009 (UTC).[reply]
- Delete NN Josh Parris 01:04, 27 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. The top WorldCat holding is a relatively low 112 for the book Steeped in the world of tea. Otherwise, nothing that could be used to justify keeping under WP:PROF.--Eric Yurken (talk) 00:56, 28 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.