Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Covenant Care

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 20:39, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Covenant Care

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Wikipedia is supposed to be a summary of what third-party sources say. This article uses no citations and is a summary of self-published promotional information about this organization. Blue Rasberry (talk) 15:26, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Music1201 ^talk 03:02, 30 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 20:04, 30 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Health and fitness-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 20:04, 30 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 20:05, 30 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

'Delete - self promotion --Zackmann08 (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 19:43, 3 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:02, 6 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. A combination of a detailed directory listing with a little advertising. DGG ( talk ) 04:28, 6 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete -- promo copy on a non-notable company. K.e.coffman (talk) 04:33, 6 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment --The coverage is all either local and / or trivial. If the article is pruned of promotional / self-cited / uncited material, there will be nothing left. The article was created by a single purpose account Special:Contributions/Andrew_bertran, so there's most likely an issue of COI here. K.e.coffman (talk) 17:20, 13 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete -- per above. Promotional and not enough coverage in reliable sources. Jujutacular (talk) 22:37, 13 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.