Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Covius (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 19:36, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Covius

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I feel like the article is almost a candidate for speedy deletion as an article about a company that does not indicate why its subject is important or significant and as borderline spam. But let's assume it's not quite bad enough for speedy deletion, the problem remains that the article does not seem to meet the basic notability criterion. There are currently no references in the article but what I can find through Google consists basically of press releases and other sources that are not independent of the company or routine coverage of the company's acquisitions. It should be noted that recent edits to the page seem to be the work of the marketing director for Covius. (I know that's not a reason for deletion but if the article is kept, this should be addressed) Pichpich (talk) 17:27, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 21:30, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Finance-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 21:30, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 21:30, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Colorado-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 21:30, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Badly written commercial spam without independent sources. Xxanthippe (talk) 21:37, 26 November 2018 (UTC).[reply]
Delete Very clearly fails WP:NCORP notability requirements. Blatantly promotional. Jmertel23 (talk) 18:41, 29 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.