Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Crispin Money-Coutts, 9th Baron Latymer

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Daniel (talk) 21:08, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Crispin Money-Coutts, 9th Baron Latymer

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article on a British peer does not have good sourcing. I have carried out WP:BEFORE and not found anything to add. I do not think he meets WP:GNG or WP:BIO. The current seven sources are:

an article on a site called TheOceans.net, unsure if it is reliable;
a link to his book on Amazon;
a review of his daughter's novel, doesn't mention him
another review of his daughter's novel, doesn't mention him
an article by his daughter, mentions him in passing
another article by his daughter, does not mention him
an interview with his daughter and ex-wife, mentions him in passing Tacyarg (talk) 19:43, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Tacyarg (talk) 19:43, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Tacyarg (talk) 19:43, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Finance-related deletion discussions. Tacyarg (talk) 19:43, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Tacyarg (talk) 19:43, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Tacyarg (talk) 19:43, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:NOTINHERETED. Shankargb (talk) 03:21, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep As he has an entry in UK Who's Who Piecesofuk (talk) 16:30, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per WP:SIGCOV. There's enough coverage, between the Telegraph and Who's Who. Bearian (talk) 18:22, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: There seems to be enough significant coverage to pass BIO.TheRedDomitor (talk) 05:42, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. We should actually try to complete this important English historical set. The Wikidata page's Identifiers has more useful info. Cordially, History DMZ ^{(HQ) † (wire)} 08:53, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.