Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cronin Economics

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Though not technically a speedy, I'm deleting this by SNOW--it is so completely unfit for WP that no other conclusion is possible. DGG ( talk ) 17:09, 29 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Cronin Economics

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Personal Essay, delete per WP:NOTESSAY and WP:NOTOPINION. There is nothing here that could be salvaged into an encyclopedic article. Monty ₈₄₅ 03:47, 28 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete per the G11 criterion. While it's not your typical case, G11 is intended for "Pages that are exclusively promotional, and would need to be fundamentally rewritten to become encyclopedic," and its purview includes points of view. This article serves no purpose other than to promote its creator's POV, and is practically the definition of "would need to be fundamentally rewritten to become encyclopedic." — Francophonie&Androphilie (Je vous invite à me parler) 11:59, 28 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete—terrible article, but it doesn't merit a speedy delete. An article that "serves no purpose other than to promote its creator's POV" has another name on Wikipedia: WP:NPOV. הסרפד (Hasirpad) [formerly Ratz...bo] 00:58, 29 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

See WP:NOTCSD הסרפד (Hasirpad) [formerly Ratz...bo] 00:59, 29 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.