Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daria Khaltourina

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. No prejudice against speedy renomination. — Mr. Stradivarius ^{(have a chat)} 06:03, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Daria Khaltourina

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

After pruning this article (ALL the content was "sourced" to the subject's own work, sometimes with links to buy the book, and it made rather grandiose claims about her importance) I did the various Google searches--in Books, since she's an academic, and in News, since supposedly she is a public figure--and came up with nothing, nothing at all, with her name in both spellings, with and without middle name. What we have is a puff piece for a person who, as far as I can tell, doesn't meet the GNG or PROF. I'll stand corrected if such evidence as indices and impacts are cited, reliably. Drmies (talk) 03:49, 7 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Dear Drmies, you should rather google Scholar. The results would be quite different, see http://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&q=Khaltourina&btnG=&as_sdt=1%2C5&as_sdtp=

Phanerozoic (talk) 21:00, 18 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

BTW, feel free to peruse the history to see what it was like--this is the version advertised in the DYK section in February. Drmies (talk) 03:56, 7 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Social science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:18, 7 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:18, 7 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete?. GS gives cites of 49, 53, 24, 18 and then peters out. Too early for WP:Prof#C1. Is there anything else? Xxanthippe (talk) 00:08, 9 September 2012 (UTC).[reply]
Keep. But also do not forget to GS Халтурина - http://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=%D0%A5%D0%B0%D0%BB%D1%82%D1%83%D1%80%D0%B8%D0%BD%D0%B0&btnG=&hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C5 Orangasli (talk) 21:08, 18 September 2012 (UTC) — Orangasli (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]

These cites are no different. Xxanthippe (talk).

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 13:13, 14 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BusterD (talk) 14:57, 21 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: I'm getting a WP:SOCK vibe from the two keep !votes here. - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 00:14, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.