Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daybreak (folk)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 04:45, 26 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Daybreak (folk) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Fails A7 = "An article about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content that does not indicate why its subject is important or significant." Also fails all twelve notability criteria for musicans and ensembles outlined as per WP:BAND. Article also fails to list any sources, references or citations. Alphageekpa (talk) 13:37, 12 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pennsylvania-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:32, 12 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:33, 12 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ffm 18:07, 16 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]- This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 13:37, 21 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - It's probably too late for a speedy tag, but this band does not appear notable. They are not signed with a major label. No reliable sources provided, none found. TN‑X-Man 13:48, 21 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.