Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Debattama Saha

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Daniel (talk) 07:50, 9 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Debattama Saha

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Single significant role, fails WP:NACTOR and sources don't meet WP:GNG criteria.--Aleyamma38 (talk) 06:41, 19 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. --Aleyamma38 (talk) 06:41, 19 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. --Aleyamma38 (talk) 06:41, 19 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. --Aleyamma38 (talk) 06:41, 19 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2021 April 19. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 06:57, 19 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:06, 19 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep She acted in three movies out of which acted in major roles in Ishaaron Ishaaron Mein and Shaurya Aur Anokhi Ki Kahani. So passes WP:NACTOR for which the actress need at least two major roles. Kirtos67 (talk) 22:22, 19 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Kirtos67- The subject has ONLY ONE SIGNIFICANT ROLE which is at present in Shaurya Aur Anokhi Ki Kahani. Her role in Ishaaron Ishaaron Mein does not have any reliable sources to claim it to be of A MAJOR ROLE. Hence, the subject fails both WP:NACTOR & WP:GNG.

Plus the Wikipedian article of the subject has no in-depth resources which makes it a case of WP:TOOSOON. Therefore, this article on Debattama Saha is strongly recommended to be DELETED.--Aleyamma38 (talk) 04:57, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, including because sources added to the article help show that per WP:NACTOR, she has had significant roles in multiple notable television shows. Beccaynr (talk) 20:56, 20 April 2021 (UTC) Note to closing admin: I am referring to this version of the article diff, which has since been substantially changed by Aleyamma38. Thank you, Beccaynr (talk) 05:24, 21 April 2021 (UTC) (comment updated to reflect article Talk page discussion and consensus) Beccaynr (talk) 04:38, 22 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: Clear that she plays a major role in Shaurya Aur Anokhi Ki Kahani and Ishaaron Ishaaron Mein. Furius (talk) 21:09, 20 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note to closing admin: As claimed by Beccaynr, yes I have substantially changed the article because Beccaynr had been doing a lot of FAN BASED EDITING in Debattama Saha which had led to article being WP:PUFFERY which is strictly against Wikipedian rules and regulations. Plus, I removed PINKVILLA which is an UNRELIABLE SOURCE according to WP:RELIABLE. I really appreciate that Beccaynr has improved the article but that does not meant he/she or any other editor is allowed to do FAN BASED EDITING which will make the Wikipedian article seem to be an ad-based article. Thanks--Aleyamma38 (talk) 05:34, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment These issues are discussed at Talk:Debattama Saha. Thank you, Beccaynr (talk) 17:59, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting this once just to see what folks think of the article in it's current state. Please keep arguments about "fans" and whatever off this page. This is just about if the article should be KEPT, DELETED, REDIRECTED or draftified, frankly.

keep it civil and chill on the unnecessary bolding please. LOL.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Missvain (talk) 18:06, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.