Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dirtymouth

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. per WP:SK#1. Nomination withdrawn with no outstanding delete votes. (non-admin closure) –Davey2010 • (talk) 19:40, 31 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Dirtymouth

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

One line article about a film that fails WP:NFILM. No reliable sources were found. Jim Carter (from public cyber) 12:17, 31 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I found this lengthy review on the NY Times website in about 4 seconds. Lugnuts ^{Dick Laurent is dead} 16:56, 31 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Withdraw nomination totally missed that. Thanks, Lugnuts I have added it in the article. Review from a reliable source- passes WP:NFILM. Just need a bit expansion, but as it said by someone Afd is not stub deletion nor it is clean up, this Afd must be keep. Jim Carter (from public cyber) 19:26, 31 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.