Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/East River Crawler
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. The Bushranger One ping only 03:43, 5 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- East River Crawler (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This stub article lacks notability and reliable sources. Astros4477 (talk) 16:52, 22 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak delete - I agree that it lacks sources, and that a basic Google search yielded no notable results. Kinkreet~♥moshi moshi♥~ 17:02, 22 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Illinois-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:15, 22 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Courcelles 00:19, 29 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Searches on Google and ProQuest Newsstand yielded no reliable sources that establish notability. Edge3 (talk) 03:36, 29 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I couldn't find a single mention in a reliable third party publicatgion after 7 or eight pages of google. PortlandOregon97217 (talk) 04:54, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.