Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/English quotes about birds

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. The article can not be transwikied to Wikiquote, since it contains three sayings, not anything that fits the definition of Wikiquote: "Wikiquote is a free online compendium of sourced quotations from notable people and creative works in every language"[1]. Fram (talk) 07:44, 28 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

English quotes about birds

original research, 3 unreferenced quotes, with somebodys interpretation of them Wuhwuzdat (talk) 19:47, 20 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information or a place for the original research in the notes column.--RadioFan (talk) 19:50, 20 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Unlikely article topic. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Many otters • One bat • One hammer)} 19:56, 20 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Keep. This doesn't explicitly fall into "not an indiscriminate collection" - there are plenty of similar sorts of "collections" on Wikipedia. As long as the creator here can substantiate with references that this isn't original research, keep. I'm giving the benefit of the doubt. Otherwise, transwiki to Wikiquote or delete. Vicenarian (talk) 19:57, 20 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Transwiki to Wikiquote, which would be a much better place for something like this. It does seem to be a bit homework-esque. Doc Strange^MailboxLogbook 21:42, 20 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Very weak keep: provided there are some references added, otherwise transwiki per above.--It's me...Sallicio!^{$\color {Red}\oplus$} 02:20, 23 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Transwiki to Wikiquote, which is probably a better home for content like this. Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 03:33, 23 May 2009 (UTC).[reply]
Transwiki. While the title of the article is so oddly specific it amuses me, it's so short, and would work better in Wikiquote anyways. But those quotes are probably already over there in some status. Basically, delete it, or move it, but get it offa my lawn. Zivlok (talk) 19:43, 24 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Transwiki. Better off in wikiquote than wikipedia. On wikipedia it is a gross violation of [{WP:NOR]] and looks like funcruft. Would be better off on wikiquote. TharsHammar^Bits and^Pieces 02:56, 28 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.