Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Epizootiology

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Regardless of whether this is the best title, the subject seems to be notable. RL0919 (talk) 16:08, 2 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Epizootiology (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unreferenced dictionary article Rathfelder (talk) 12:00, 26 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 15:09, 26 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
We should follow the sources, which indicate that veterinary epidemiology is now the preferred term (e.g. 1 , 2). This is likely why the textbooks on the subject use that term, whereas Epizootiology/Epizoology tend to be used by authors talking about specific cases rather than the subject as a whole.--Pontificalibus 16:43, 26 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Animal-related deletion discussions. North America1000 09:58, 1 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.