Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Erica Mendez (Model)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedily deleted by User:Bbb23 per CSD A7. (non-admin closure) • Gene93k (talk) 01:16, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Erica Mendez (Model)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable individual, only apparent claim to fame is being the girlfriend of a college football player -- JamesMoose (talk) 22:59, 9 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Erica Mendez should be just as notable as half of the irrelevant other articles. Odell Beckham is a first round Pick and has been covered in major sources such as USA Today and others and has a magnitude of google hits. Their relationship has gained a lot of attention, even being sought out by celebrity sites for interviews. She's not the girlfriend, they're engaged/already possibly married, judging from the Starpulse interview. http://q.usatoday.com/2014/02/23/nfl-combine-odell-beckham-mike-evans-impress/ http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/football-insider/wp/2014/02/22/lsu-wr-odell-beckham-jr-hoping-to-capitalize-on-speed-versatility/ http://www.starpulse.com/news/index.php/2014/03/08/erica_mendez_and_odell_beckham_talk_sp http://www.therichest.com/celebnetworth/celeb/model/erica-mendez-net-worth/ https://www.google.com/#q=odell+beckham+erica+mendez

Sportstiger (talk) 23:11, 9 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Notability is not inherited. Ish dar ian 23:25, 9 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Non-notable. Ish dar ian 23:25, 9 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep How does that apply? "Their" relationship is what's getting interviews. Both of them. Heck, most of the news concerns her instead of him. What is the different in notable between her and say Chantel Jeffries? Erica Mendez should have more grounds, since she's really married to someone. Sportstiger (talk) 23:28, 9 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.