Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Exposing Homelessness

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was No Consensus. There is no consensus as to whether the proffered sources are sufficient to meat WP:N or not. Eluchil404 (talk) 06:54, 18 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Exposing Homelessness

All that I can find is trivial mentions. Fails WP:NF. Joe Chill (talk) 13:32, 4 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. -- –Juliancolton | ^Talk 14:26, 4 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Not sure. The film is covered in SF Gate and it gets 739 Google results. It is perhaps not notable enough now. Mosy likely would be delete. -- RUL3R^{*flaming | *vandalism} 14:32, 4 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment I was involved in a nice rescue of this article, giving it proper format per MOS and sourcing... review and awards... Then I hit a wrong button and closed the edit page before saving the article. Ouch. I'll be back once I redo my work. MichaelQSchmidt (talk) 01:17, 5 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep Okay... redid the lost work. The article is better, but still needs work. There should be an article on the filmmaker Kerri Gawryn [1] and this article could then be merged to that one. MichaelQSchmidt (talk) 05:30, 5 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

MQS, to avoid losing work in future there's a Firefox extension called Lazarus that saves info you type into edit windows as you type, and can restore it at the click of a button. V handy, has saved me from browser crashes etc. many a time. Fences&Windows 03:07, 7 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I'll begin using Firefox more often and add the tool. Excelent. MichaelQSchmidt (talk) 10:45, 10 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, and Very weak keep due to SF Chronicle story and the awards. Fences&Windows 03:09, 7 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 02:54, 11 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Insufficiently “notable”. —SlamDiego_←T 08:21, 11 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, this looks like an effort to publicize a thesis. Irbisgreif (talk) 15:29, 11 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- That it may have begun as a thesis film should not matter if WP:NF can be met. MichaelQSchmidt (talk) 02:16, 16 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.