Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fiscal Wake-Up Tour

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 09:00, 10 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Fiscal Wake-Up Tour (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline and the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (companies) requirement. News coverage seems to be mostly in passing (a bit of it is related to a documentary about the tour, but that's a different topic and the documentary doesn't appear very notable, either). I did fine on paragraph in a book [1] and a bit longer interview [2] in another, but overall I think it seems to fall on the wrong side of notability. Perhaps someone else can find better sources? Otherwise I am afraid this was a non-notable event. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 08:35, 19 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 09:28, 19 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 09:28, 19 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. North America1000 22:27, 19 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Finance-related deletion discussions. North America1000 22:27, 19 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:23, 26 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Abelmoschus Esculentus talk / contribs 09:35, 2 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: does not meet WP:NORG / WP:EVENT; significant RS coverage not found. Also fails WP:ADVOCACY with these statements (much of the article): "The combination of the "big three" entitlements (Medicare, Social Security, and Medicaid)...; The unfunded federal future obligations..." Etc. Wikipedia is not a place for soapboxing or promotion. K.e.coffman (talk) 01:19, 4 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.