Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fnality International
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 23:30, 16 August 2023 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Fnality International (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable blockchain company, seems to only be mentioned in PR pieces, promoting whatever they're selling to investors. Oaktree b (talk) 23:24, 9 August 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Finance-related deletion discussions. Oaktree b (talk) 23:24, 9 August 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Cryptocurrency and Companies. Skynxnex (talk) 01:59, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
- Leaning delete - distinct lack of WP:CORPDEPTH and non-press-releases in that WP:REFBOMB - David Gerard (talk) 14:37, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 17:56, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.