Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Friðþjófur Thorsteinsson
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy keep. Withdrawn by nominator following provision of sources indicating significant coverage. No delete votes at time of closing. Fenix down (talk) 00:27, 21 December 2021 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Friðþjófur Thorsteinsson (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Lacks significance of notability. Sabeelul hidaya (talk) 00:53, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Sabeelul hidaya (talk) 00:53, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. Sabeelul hidaya (talk) 00:53, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Sabeelul hidaya (talk) 00:53, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Iceland-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 05:20, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
- Keep while the article needs work (it is poorly translated from the Icelandic Wiki) and sources, a simple WP:BEFORE would have turned up several sources on the man that establish that he passes WP:GNG.[1][2][3][4]. Alvaldi (talk) 09:49, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
- Comment I have cleaned up the article and added several sources to it. Alvaldi (talk) 11:18, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
- Keep as per above, there are clearly sources that show he satisfies WP:GNG. Joseph2302 (talk) 11:53, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 18:47, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
- Keep - meets GNG per sources added. GiantSnowman 18:49, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
- Keep - sources highlighted by Alvaldi show that the subject meets GNG, which supersedes NFOOTBALL Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 21:50, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
- Speedy Keep the article. I am withdrawing the request after realizing the truth. Thanks to Alvaldi and other contributors for the good work. Sabeelul hidaya (talk) 11:00, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.