Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GKD Sports Cars
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Following the presentation of additional sources a consensus to 'keep' has emerged. Just Chilling (talk) 13:29, 21 July 2019 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- GKD Sports Cars (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Unreferenced and promotional Rathfelder (talk) 20:29, 6 July 2019 (UTC)
- Delete pretty open and shut. No sources and written poorly. MaskedSinger (talk) 20:35, 6 July 2019 (UTC)
- I agree that it should be deleted, although poorly written articles can be saved with some clean up. William2001(talk) 21:16, 6 July 2019 (UTC)
Delete Clearly not notable per both WP:GNG and WP:NCORP. William2001(talk) 21:15, 6 July 2019 (UTC)Keep with the source provided. Didn't see that. Thanks. William2001(talk) 00:14, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 22:17, 6 July 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 22:18, 6 July 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 22:18, 6 July 2019 (UTC)
- Keep - the German Wikipedia article has two sources that can be used, and demonstrate that at least GNG is met. Needing improvment is not a reason to delete. Mjroots (talk) 04:44, 7 July 2019 (UTC)
- Keep as per sources on Google News and Google Books, Meets GNG. –Davey2010Talk 15:25, 8 July 2019 (UTC)
- Keep The sources provided allow the article to pass the WP:GNG. Also, deletion is not cleanup. AmericanAir88(talk) 04:20, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 12:44, 14 July 2019 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 12:44, 14 July 2019 (UTC)
- Keep per above. Zach of the cosmos (talk) 22:53, 14 July 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.