Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Geje Eustaquio (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 09:50, 12 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Geje Eustaquio

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject is a mixed martial arts fighter. Fails WP:NMMA - have not fought top tier promotion. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 03:06, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 03:10, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 03:13, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 03:13, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Easy keep. I dunno how an article of 24 references with reliable sources as diverse as ABS-CBN Sports, Philippine Daily Inquirer and Channel News Asia can fail WP:GNG, granted half of the other references are MMA-centric sources which I can't vouch for... Howard the Duck (talk) 03:37, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete As per nominator. This should have been speedy deleted as a repost of the previous recent AfD discussion which got it right with respect to both WP:NMMA and WP:GNG.PRehse (talk) 12:49, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete He hasn't done anything to become more notable since the deletion in late August of this year. He still fails to meet WP:NMMA. In fact, he hasn't had a fight since June. There are a lot of references given, but there's still a lack of significant independent coverage to show he meets WP:GNG. Coverage is predominantly about upcoming ONE fights and results, which can only be considered as typical sports reporting. Papaursa (talk) 19:38, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
WP:GNG satisfied. I have added three in depth references on this person's activities outside getting beat up (and beating other people up). That should be enough whether or not he passes WP:NMMA. Howard the Duck (talk) 09:14, 24 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You added an article from the sports.inquirer.net's daily column on ONE FC about him wanting to become a pro mountain biker, although there's no indication he's ever competed in biking at any level, and it's entirely based on an interview with him. And you added a link to where his MMA team came out against bullying. I don't these are enough to meet WP:GNG. Papaursa (talk) 14:53, 24 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 19:12, 28 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 15:23, 4 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

delete Fails to meet WP:NMMA. Most of the coverage is typical sports reporting or not independent. The coverage that isn't one of those two does not rise to the level of showing that the GNG is met--interviews, passing mentions, etc.Sandals1 (talk) 19:17, 8 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.