Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/George Staab

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete per consensus and as an unsourced BLP per WP:BLP. Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:10, 10 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

George Staab

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Tagged for notability since February 2010, no change from that now. Shirt58 (talk) 10:24, 3 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Although he has a few brief biographies on various websites, he is not notable enough. Besides his books are mainly directed at specialists. TYelliot (talk) 10:28, 3 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - I can not find significant coverage in reliable sources that establish notability. ~~ GB fan ~~ 10:34, 3 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Weak delete: doesn't meet WP:ACADEMIC in its current state. Perhaps someone with knowledge of his work could make additions that show otherwise. -- BenTels (talk) 11:35, 3 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No significant enough coverage to establish notability. DARTH SIDIOUS 2 ^(Contact) 11:57, 3 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Undoubtedly doing a good job, but doing a job. Unless something more is added and sourced, the article as it stands taken with its lack of referencing doesn't indicate sufficient notability. Peridon (talk) 12:44, 3 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:22, 4 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Currently do not see adequate evidence of notability AlgebraT (talk) 01:51, 9 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, unable to find any reliable sources independent of the subject, does not meet WP:GNG. J04n(talk page) 17:42, 9 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.