Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gina Iniong

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Consensus is that the subject doesn't meet WP:NMMA or WP:GNG. ♠PMC(talk) 04:27, 29 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Gina Iniong (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject is a MMA fighters. Fails WP:MMABIO notability requirements as subject has not fought in any top tier promotion and not secured any major title. Sources included major is record of routine sport info which would considered as trivial routine sport report. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 12:16, 14 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 12:16, 14 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 12:16, 14 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 12:16, 14 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - per nom. Bubbasax (talk) 23:45, 14 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep - I don't get the reasoning of the nomination since this article should not have been created in the first place if Ms. Iniong is not notable given the coverage of media outlets when you click on the Google News articles about her (aside from ABS-CBN news). But since the bio is about an MMA female fighter, there must be at least some notability for example her participation on ONE Championship competitions and her current MMA rank in the South East Asia region. First claim: Not Notabile based on not having a fight under any top tier promotion? Like not being represented by Top Rank or Golden Boy Promotion? Okay. (Sorry, those are boxing promotion companies though). Second claim: No major titles won. Fair enough. Third claim: All sources/references are just citing record of routine sport info and will fall as "trivial report". So the article are just about plain statistics like game logs? Please elaborate on this one. And also, can someone else comment on this third claim? I don't watch MMA though so I am commenting on the form (references, lay-out, lead, verifiability, etc.) which I find okay. I am the only dissenting vote here so please change my mind particularly on the third claim.—Allenjambalaya (talk) 13:24, 15 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment Allenjambalaya Pls read WP:MMABIO and WP:NSPORT.. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 13:30, 15 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 23:05, 16 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete She has no top tier MMA fights so she definitely fails to meet WP:NMMA. The coverage seems to consist of sports reporting that would be typical for any professional fighter and the onefc articles are not independent. I don't believe that WP:GNG is met. Papaursa (talk) 01:02, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NNADIGOODLUCK (Talk|Contribs) 15:01, 21 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.