Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gwyn Pritchard
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. The Bushranger One ping only 01:11, 23 October 2013 (UTC)
- Gwyn Pritchard (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No biographical coverage in mainstream sources - seems to fail WP:BIO/WP:ARTIST over notability. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 07:39, 15 October 2013 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:48, 15 October 2013 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:48, 15 October 2013 (UTC)
- Comment'
Speedy delete as a COPYVIO of http://web.archive.org/web/20110719112612/http://www.verlag-neue-musik.de/verlag/authors.php?language=en&authors_id=535 . I gutted the article so you can see what it looks like without the copyrighted text. Hold off on speedy for 24 hours or so to allow for a total non-copyvio rewrite, if anyone cares to do so using acceptable sources, assuming of course that WP:Notability exists at all. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 16:58, 15 October 2013 (UTC)Someone expanded what I left behind so it's at least coherent and not a copyvio. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 19:24, 15 October 2013 (UTC)- Notifications of request to speedy-delete to: Richard Witson, Jimfbleak, and Piotrus. Notification of AFD and request to speedy delete to: Toccatta quarta. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 17:13, 15 October 2013 (UTC)
- Since you have removed the copyright infringements, speedy deletion is no longer applicable. I recommend deletion nonetheless because of lack of notabiltiy. De728631 (talk) 18:23, 15 October 2013 (UTC)
- Delete per apparent non-notability (I didn't do a search) and actual failure to demonstrate notability with just the sources listed. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 19:24, 15 October 2013 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.