Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hair serum

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to hair conditioner. (non-admin closure) –Davey2010^Talk 23:27, 19 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hair serum

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested PROD. Hardly an encyclopaedia article in its current state. Adam9007 (talk) 21:20, 30 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Health and fitness-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 00:54, 31 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:31, 6 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Music1201 ^talk 21:47, 12 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

delete. Unreferenced marketing babble. "Hair Serum" snake oils been on market since 19th century. I see no evidence it is a special category of hair care product. It is just a marketing synonym for "lotion" Staszek Lem (talk) 23:08, 12 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. This is not a notable topic. --Frmorrison (talk) 19:33, 13 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - not notable and unencyclopedic. MB 04:00, 15 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to Hair conditioner. Basically the same thing. In fact, it's a pretty clear merge, and by merging, we avoid the redlink that is just bait to have the article recreated again. Montanabw^(talk) 21:11, 17 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Merge: Per Montanabw, article should be merged to Hair conditioner. Safehaven86 (talk) 17:22, 19 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to hair conditioner; "serum" is just a hair care marketing pseudoscience term. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 20:18, 19 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.