Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hennessy Catholic College

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Snow Keep. Mark Arsten (talk) 15:34, 3 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hennessy Catholic College

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

It doesn't say anything bout anything really MrNiceGuy1113 (talk) 13:57, 28 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Not a reason for deletion. Article might not meet notability requirements, but "It's short" isn't a proper reason. Buggie111 (talk) 15:03, 28 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep – Per Wikipedia:Notability (high schools) and WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES. Verified secondary schools are typically allowed to have a stand-alone article on Wikipedia. Note that this "college" actually teaches students in years 7-12. Northamerica1000^(talk) 23:32, 28 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
DELETE No mention of this school in any reliable sources to be found. This is a small high school with no notability. The article referenced on the "notability of schools" above is an essay and not a Wikipedia Guideline. There is no information that could be included other than to say that the school exists.OfficeGirl (talk) 23:49, 28 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Keep - No valid rationale for deletion presented. Consensus is to default to keep secondary and higher education pieces. Carrite (talk) 00:07, 29 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per WP:OUTCOMES#Schools. It's not an essay, its a report on clearly established precedents that have been observed for a long time, and many, many PEREN discussions and even orchestrated AfD campaigns have failed to get it changed. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 12:23, 29 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I would agree on the high schools issue if there were at least ONE WP:RS reliable source. I am just now noticing how new this article is. It would be good for one of the proponents of the article to find SOMETHING as a reliable source, not just the school's own website.OfficeGirl (talk) 18:48, 29 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The school's website verifies it exists. For a secondary school, that's sufficient for an article to exist on it. -- Necrothesp (talk) 00:39, 31 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:19, 30 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:19, 30 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. All verified secondary schools are generally presumed to be notable. -- Necrothesp (talk) 23:42, 30 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: Per WP:OUTCOMES#Schools. Incomplete article is not a good rationale for deletion as article content may not reflect availability of sources. --LauraHale (talk) 01:23, 2 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - no sound reason for deletion has been adduced. Senior high school and no reason why it can't meet WP:ORG. The solution is to expand not delete. TerriersFan (talk) 13:52, 2 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.