Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hugh Mitchell (actor)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. Carlossuarez46 21:13, 19 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hugh Mitchell (actor)

Non-notable child actor- only two minor roles in two major films. Article itself needs improving also. Apartknow 00:05, 14 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Seriously? He had a significant role in both Chamber of Secrets (as the kid following Harry everywhere) and the Da Vinci Code (as the childhood version of the bad guy). Smashville 00:50, 14 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Smashville. — xDanielx ^T/_C 06:17, 14 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Significant roles in both films, and multiple UK Drama series'. ≈ Maurauth ^(Ravenor) 07:46, 14 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Smashville & Maurauth. Looks like there's enough significance to the roles and films to meet WP:BIO for actors.Cube lurker 13:38, 14 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Moderately significant character in a very large series of films. J Milburn 20:22, 14 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Smashville and Maurauth, notability seems pretty clear and would meet WP:BIO. Article needs work though. Raystorm (¿Sí?) 13:18, 15 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Has been in major roles in primetime British drama series as well. [User:ckydavies|ckydavies]] 15:50, 15 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete insignificant per Smashville's description. --Leocomix 18:26, 15 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Explain how Harry Potter and the Da Vinci Code are insignificant, please? Smashville 00:20, 16 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  - Harry Potter and the Da Vinci Code aren't, but this chap is in relation to them I'm afraid--Apartknow 12:18, 16 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  - Well, it's a very significant part in the 7th one. ≈ Maurauth ^(Ravenor) 18:40, 16 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep He seems to be notable enough as an actor. Steve Dufour 21:52, 16 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep has played in at least 3 blockbuster movies.--JForget 22:44, 16 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I totally disagree. He is in no way notable. His role in the Da Vinci Code was short and not memorable. His acting in Harry Potter was appalling also. Morevisit 17:16, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment How well he acts hardly has anything to do with it, this vote should be ignored; the user is Permabanned. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.6.17.37 (talk) 21:59, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, his list of credits establishes notability. NawlinWiki 17:50, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.