Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ikram Ali Malik

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:20, 9 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ikram Ali Malik

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:BLP of a government bureaucrat, not reliably sourced as passing our inclusion criteria for government bureaucrats. The role here is not an "inherently" notable one that would guarantee inclusion in Wikipedia just because he exists, so his includability depends on getting him over WP:GNG on the sourcing -- but there's only one footnote here, which isn't enough, and the article's been flagged for that problem for seven years without ever being improved at all. Bearcat (talk) 14:00, 2 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians and Pakistan. Bearcat (talk) 14:00, 2 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Mccapra (talk) 17:39, 2 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.