Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jason Pinizzotto

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 01:13, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Jason Pinizzotto

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject does not meet WP:NHOCKEY. Only 90 games played in DEL which would have been enough to pass #2 if he was a goaltender, but as a forward 200 is required and he's thus 110 games short. No preeminent honours of note to pass #3 and #4 as well. Tay87 (talk) 20:47, 13 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Tay87 (talk) 20:47, 13 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ice hockey-related deletion discussions. Tay87 (talk) 20:47, 13 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Tay87 (talk) 20:47, 13 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ontario-related deletion discussions. Tay87 (talk) 20:47, 13 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Just Chilling (talk) 20:48, 20 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete since subject fails WP:NHOCKEY per nominator's well stated reasoning. -The Gnome (talk) 10:23, 27 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete As the nominator states, he is short of the requirements for WP:NHOCKEY. AmericanAir88^(talk) 13:41, 27 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.