Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jodon F. Romero
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Appears to be merely routine crime news - note all sources are from a two day period, etc. WilyD 08:50, 19 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Jodon F. Romero (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:1E and WP:EVENT. Subject is not notable. WP is not News. Article does not indicate lasting effects of this man's suicide. WingtipvorteX PTT ∅ 03:28, 11 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - there is no evidence of notability beyond the one event; his death (WP:BDP obviously applies). The vast majority of the edits are from the same editor so it would be useful to get some comments from them as to why they might think there is substance to this beyond WP:BLP1E. Stalwart111 (talk) 04:16, 11 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - His last crime and death are not significant for a Wikipedia article thus failing Wikipedia:CRIME. SwisterTwister talk 06:16, 11 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Remain - Based on the arguments I am hearing, Christine Chubbuck could also be considered a solitary event and also not notable. -User:Scoutstr295
- That may well be true but WP:OTHERSTUFF is not a very good reason for keeping this article. If you think something does not meet the criteria for inclusion, you are free to nominate it for deletion. Stalwart111 (talk) 22:37, 11 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:47, 11 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:47, 11 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.