Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jordan Pretty

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 12:58, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Jordan Pretty

Contested Prod. Taking it here to see if anyone can find something establishing notability for this individual. Is a presence on YouTube and Myspace enough to justify the inclusion of this article? I cannot find any reliable sources to back the assertion of notability here. Steamroller Assault (talk) 07:20, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - I PROD'ed it just because it wasn't eligible for CSD. This is a vanity page, nothing more. A cursory search returns nothing verifiable that could establish notability. §FreeRangeFrog 07:23, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - per nom - no hint of notability. Majorclanger (talk) 14:48, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete There are certainly cases where internet notability is enough to justify inclusion, but not in this case. fuzzy510 (talk) 21:41, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I wish this young man the best in his career, but Wikipedia is not the place to promote it. At the moment he seems to be too thin on notability to merit coverage in Wikipedia. Note that of the three external links provided, two of them are links to his own website, and the third is to his model agency. Also, as nearly all of the contributions to this article are made by one single-purpose account, it seems almost certain that the contributor is the subject himself. •••Life of Riley (T–C) 22:03, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I agree that we should wish the young man luck, but that doesn't mean we should house a page for him. Not notable, no meaningful sources Tractops (talk) 06:14, 15 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete — Does not meet notability guidelines for entertainers. Article appears largely promotional for a person trying to break into the field. — ERcheck (talk) 01:51, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Non notable fails WP:ENTERTAINER. BigDunc^Talk 23:01, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.