Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/KPovModeler
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Davewild (talk) 18:51, 7 July 2015 (UTC)
- KPovModeler (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Project is dead. The article didn't have secondary sources never --Be nt all (talk) 20:01, 19 May 2015 (UTC)
- Comment Discussion page was created without afd2 template and never transluded to a daily log. Fixed now--no further comment on the nomination itself. --Finngall talk 18:44, 22 June 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:39, 23 June 2015 (UTC)
- Delete - Software article of unclear notability, lacking independent references. A search turned up forum posts, but no significant WP:RS coverage.Dialectric (talk) 18:57, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JAaron95 (Talk) 13:50, 30 June 2015 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JAaron95 (Talk) 13:50, 30 June 2015 (UTC)
- Unfortunately delete (with no apparently good target for moving elsewhere) as my searches found nothing particularly significant regarding coverage with the best being this. SwisterTwister talk 06:05, 5 July 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.