Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kanto (Pokémon)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep Sceptre ^(talk) 18:11, 5 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Kanto (Pokémon)

Look at THe AfD articles about Hoenn and Johto! Same reason. --Fivexthethird (talk) 19:24, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the list of video game related deletions. MrKIA11 (talk) 19:25, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per my reasons at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Johto. Dekkappai (talk) 21:29, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. —Dekkappai (talk) 21:33, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per my reasons at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Johto, [1]. I also did a major copyedit and trim for this article. Artichoker^talk 21:38, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Keep Seems to be a violation of WP:POINT --Patar knight - ^chat/_{contributions} 01:03, 5 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per the above comments, and per this post I'm thinking this nomination (and the other two) are bad-faith WP:POINT noms Abwayax (c :: t) 01:05, 5 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep this article has been referenced by literature establishing notability. It has been referenced in the same way I referenced Johto and Sinnoh.([[User talk:Kurowoofwoof111|talk]]) (talk) 01:52, 5 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Again, a referenced article on a reasonably notable subject. —C.Fred (talk) 04:25, 5 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.