Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Karen Siris

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 17:39, 3 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Karen Siris

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Besides the Notability tag that has been on the article since it's December 2013 creation, this article was created by the subject's husband. No one seems to have questioned the WP:COI, but I don't see anything in this article that makes her notable enough for an article. — Maile (talk) 19:59, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 22:05, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 22:05, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Health and fitness-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 22:05, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Social science-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 22:05, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete unless this can be improved as although I found links at News, Books, browser, Scholar and Highbeam, there wasn't anything to suggest better from what I see. SwisterTwister talk 22:07, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. The claim to notability, that she is a "nationally recognized expert on bullying prevention" sources to a zoominfo web page and it is a dead link at that. Holdings of her book are only double digits, probably because it seems to be self-published (From WorldCat: "Publisher: [United States] : Roth & Siris, ©2012."). Most sources are web ephemera. Agricola44 (talk) 16:45, 29 September 2015 (UTC).[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.