Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Karolcia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) — Yellow Dingo (talk) 05:05, 10 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Karolcia

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable children's novel. The article was previously deprodded by Piotrus. GeoffreyT2000 (talk, contribs) 16:55, 2 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Poland-related deletion discussions. Jim Carter 17:38, 2 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

And would the nominator care to address the reason for Piotrus's deprodding, which is substantiated by a source in the Polish Wikipedia article? 86.17.222.157 (talk) 21:55, 2 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Clearly notable, although it's an annoying and silly girly book, most Poles have read it. Laforgue (talk) 16:54, 5 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. I appreciate User:GeoffreyT2000's ping, but I can simply repeat anon's point: in my deprod, I clearly explained why this is notable: "In the Poland The book is required reading for classes I-III schools". Seems like a clear cut case to me. Until the nominator explains his counter-argument, I consider this AfD moot.--_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 09:14, 6 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 10:43, 6 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, meets WP:NBOOK, ie. "4.The book is, or has been, the subject of instruction at two or more schools,[6] colleges, universities or post-graduate programs in any particular country." as it is required reading in Poland classes I to III, see here, tks to Piotrus above and Polish wikipedia, their article on the book is here.Coolabahapple (talk) 10:49, 6 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.