Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kelly Choi

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. The nominator did not explain why they believed Choi didn't meet inclusion criteria. Commenters mention Emmy nomination which is clearly part of the "notable award" criterion. No proper rationale for deletion given. Mgm|^(talk) 09:54, 11 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Kelly Choi

Reason Syntheticlife4m (talk) 02:45, 7 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This entry seems to be part of a group of Wikipedia entries from the same set of users. Whiile this person has some national exposure, I do not believe she fits Wikipedia's criteria for long-lasting fame, notority or importance.

Object Choi is a TV host who has appeared on national programs on PBS and NBC and is hosting "Top Chef" on Bravo. Clearly a person of prominence. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 166.217.10.224 (talk) 12:11, 7 May 2009 (UTC) — 166.217.10.224 (talk) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]

Serious Objection! I work in entertainment business in L.A. and out here, everyone knows Kelly Choi is the real deal. She s about to break really big when Top Chef Masters hits this summer. —Preceding unsigned comment added by SanFranBlondie (talk • contribs) 12:26, 7 May 2009 (UTC) — SanFranBlondie (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]

MUST OPPOSE THIS DELETION 'nuff said. Its Kelly Choi for goodness sakes! If people stop you in the streets in NYC, you definitely deserve a page on Wiki. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Waterboymichel (talk • contribs) 12:29, 8 May 2009 (UTC) — Waterboymichel (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]
Weak delete - Only two citations at present: One that the article describes as "a few months in 2006" and one for an upcoming show (see: WP:CRYSTAL). The article properly deserves to be speedy sourced per WP:BLP, but if that doesn't happen, it should be removed at least until after Top Chef Masters gains significant independent coverage. --A More Perfect Onion (talk) 12:39, 8 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - This is a new user that's been nominating a number of TV producers, and is then followed by a number of IPs "objecting" to the AfD in all caps. I'm not sure what's going on, but these are notable individuals. Emmy nominated major TV producer in a major market. A prominent role on Top Chef... quick google news search reveals a lot of articles. Shadowjams (talk) 05:25, 9 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - She is a notable individual, as her shows have actually aired on national daytime television (is that still in the article?). Just because no one has bothered to find sources doesn't mean it should be deleted, it means it should be improved. A lot of work has already gone into finding this information - we just need to find sources now. Luminifer (talk) 07:04, 9 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Korea-related deletion discussions. —PC78 (talk) 12:23, 9 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:01, 10 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. Another part of the pattern of Syntheticlife4m's noms is that they are not properly listed in the daily deletion logs (step 3). I have just listed this one. Unless this is to be a speedy keep on the basis of a bad-faith nomination, it should extend seven days from now. —David Eppstein (talk) 01:00, 11 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.