Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/LED (editor)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to ND-500. (non-admin closure) Jovanmilic97 (talk) 10:16, 17 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

LED (editor)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I have been unable to find any reliable sources to satisfy WP:V, let alone WP:PRODUCT. Adam9007 (talk) 21:24, 3 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 07:48, 4 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I will try to find at least one RS, so we can merge/redirect content of this article to another one (eg. Sintran III or Norsk Data - which already mentions it). Similar AfD about PED closed as redirect to Norsk Data. Pavlor (talk) 10:17, 4 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Merge. I uncovered no useful English press, but it does seem like it would be applicable in particular for the ND-500 page. 66.198.222.67 (talk) 22:57, 4 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:01, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Merge into ND-500. Not notable in itself, but there's some salvageable content relevant to the aforementioned page and redirects are cheap. SITH (talk) 09:35, 17 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.