Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lazlo (character)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to List of characters in Camp Lazlo. Spartaz ^Humbug! 19:01, 7 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Lazlo (character)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Clearly, this article has 8 sources and not enough real world or third party coverage to establish the notability. JJ98 (Talk) 08:08, 30 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The nomination does not provide a clear reason to delete. The character is the lead in an award-winning show whose notability seems indisputable and the rest is a matter of ordinary editing, not deletion. Warden (talk) 08:28, 30 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

There is no reason for complete deletion here. At most this should be a merge to the character article.--76.66.185.169 (talk) 04:38, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Merge/redirect per nom. The reason's clear enough, this article is failing notabiity guidelines. – Harry Blue5 (talk • contribs) 15:42, 1 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. —JJ98 (Talk) 21:20, 1 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Merge to List of characters in Camp Lazlo. It has weak coverage in third party reliable sources. Not enough for a full article. _Blake ^{(Talk·Edits)} 17:37, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Merge No independent notability, no out-of-universe views. --Crusio (talk) 12:09, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
merge Clear cut case of notability issues. Weak coverage in independent sources. 74.198.9.247 (talk) 00:43, 5 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.