Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Luke Albers

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 08:50, 22 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Luke Albers

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable college football player. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 12:09, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of American football-related deletion discussions. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 12:10, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wisconsin-related deletion discussions. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 12:10, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete unable to find any usable references in third party articles to point to passing WP:GNG. Having not played professionally, the individual does not pass WP:NGRIDIRON either. Typically we do not find the significant coverage necessary for a Division I FCS athlete to reach notability. While North Dakota State has a strong program and could indicate the possibility of an exception, I'm not finding enough here to actually follow through with the exception.--Paul McDonald (talk) 14:07, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Paulmcdonald. Just not finding significant coverage needed to pass WP:GNG. If such coverage is brought forth, I am willing to reconsider. Cbl62 (talk) 02:26, 16 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above. Didn't seem to have any significant stats in college. Lizard (talk) 02:58, 18 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.