Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maadi British International School

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Maadi. Jujutacular ^talk 16:32, 13 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Maadi British International School

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Primary-year 8 schools are not generally notable under wp standards, and are subject to deletion/redirect; this appears to be one of the NN ones. Epeefleche (talk) 22:25, 24 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Egypt-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:01, 25 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:01, 25 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete since it does not appear to satisfy WP:ORG and per WP:OUTCOMES#Schools. Edison (talk) 18:21, 27 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to locality per standard procedure. Non notable schools are generally not deleted; instead, as demonstrated by 100s of AfD closures, they are redirected to the article about the school district (USA) or to the article about the locality (rest of the world). --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 08:30, 30 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

NOTE for closer: if this AfD is closed as 'redirect', please remember to include the {{R from school}} on the redirect page. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 08:30, 30 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Bryce (talk | contribs) 01:02, 1 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect/Merge to locality or school governing body per longstanding consensus. I'm also expressing concern with the large numbers of school nominations at the moment; it can't be expected that all editors be able to respond to this mass act of deletionist ideology. ˜danjel [ talk | contribs ] 00:37, 8 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. A Google search doesn't turn up any in-depth coverage in third-party sources; most of the hits I get contain only information from the school's website, or include a brief mention of it in a directory or list of ratings with many other schools. Nothing in the article itself suggests that evidence of notability might be found elsewhere. Ammodramus (talk) 14:48, 12 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

- and that's why we generally redirect them with a mention in a parent article. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 05:33, 13 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.