Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mafia (film)
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Alpha_Quadrant (talk) 00:19, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Mafia (film) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable film. No references. No links other than IMDB, which is not a reliable source. Barely any information, other than a basic definition and the year it was made. Stedrick (talk) 19:11, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Coverage is bad, agreed, but so is coverage generally of the dark period of Bollywood in the 80s to mid 1990s. Dharmendra is one of Bollywood's biggest actors. I believe what the article now has will suffice.♦ Dr. Blofeld 20:12, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep It has been improved and sources added. BollyJeff || talk 20:25, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. —Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 20:26, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 20:26, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- Yes coverage in google books is virtually non existant, but I have a feeling quite a lot of Bollywood films of this period are the same. Maybe it was also released in a Hindi title?♦ Dr. Blofeld 20:49, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep That older Bollywood films of this period do not have extensive internet sourcability is a problem that WP:N recognizies.(See WP:ATTRIBUTES) But that it had theatrical release in India in 1996, AND a commercial re-release on television 10 years later in Canada meets one of notability considerations of WP:OEN. It has been improved enough so that having it remain and be further improved by those more able to find Hindi-language sources is reasonable. Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 21:03, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep As per MichaelQSchmidt. If the movie had theatrical release in India in 1996, and a commercial re-release on television 10 years later in Canada, then it definitely meets one of notability considerations of Wikipedia:NF#Other_evidence_of_notability. Joyson Noel Holla at me! 13:17, 11 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.