Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Make U Bounce

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn. It appears prudent to hold off an AfD discussion at this time. (Non-administrator closure) NorthAmerica1000 15:02, 29 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Make U Bounce (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This (presently unreleased) 2014 single appears to not meet WP:NSONGS at this time. After several source searches, coverage from reliable sources is lacking, and those in the article are mostly unreliable with the exception of 4Music, which appears likely to simply include a listing of the song (e.g. see the formatting of the 4Music listing for June 27 at [1]). I found this source, which is quite short in length and coverage, but that's all thus far in terms of those to establish topic notability per Wikipedia's standards. NorthAmerica1000 06:27, 29 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica1000 06:32, 29 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica1000 06:32, 29 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment. As this is released today, it is likely that things could change considerably before the 7 days is out. This is being played to death by BBC Radio 1 and seems pretty nailed on to chart (his last two singles were top 5 hits). We'll likely need to wait a couple of weeks to see whether an article is justified, and I suspect it will be. --Michig (talk) 06:52, 29 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep as it's only been released today and IMHO the nomination was way too soon, Give it a week or 2 and if nothing after then AFD is the best place. –Davey2010(talk) 14:58, 29 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.