Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mason Verger
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 06:58, 16 October 2023 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Mason Verger (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Sources in the article are either primary or do not prove the character's notability, a quick Google search does not give any sources that prove individual notability, and per WP:N, it is not worth a standalone article. If the character is not notable, I suggest a redirect and/or merge to Hannibal Lecter (franchise)#Cast and characters (perhaps not the best redirect target, but I can only think of that). Spinixster (chat!) 02:53, 8 October 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Fictional elements, Science fiction and fantasy, Literature, Film, and Television. Spinixster (chat!) 02:53, 8 October 2023 (UTC)
- Keep meets WP:GNG here's a few links from a couple minutes on ProQuest. [1][2][3] (See also Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jack Crawford (character) for my concerns about this set of 8 nominations in 7 minutes) —siroχo 07:10, 8 October 2023 (UTC)
- Let's see... the first source seems okay for use. Second source is more brief, but I think it's more about the portrayal of the character in the movie. Third source mentions the character more in a plot summary. Spinixster (chat!) 07:26, 8 October 2023 (UTC)
- Comment. Less traction in this AfD so here's a couple more sources to chew on.
- —siroχo 23:27, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Star Mississippi 22:44, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
- Leaning keep. This is not quite the central slam-dunk case as with many of the other characters, but I count sources evaluating the actor's performance of the character as evidence of the notability of the character. BD2412 T 01:00, 16 October 2023 (UTC)
- Keep the fictional character is notable. Lightburst (talk) 01:01, 16 October 2023 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.