Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mender

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh (talk) 03:00, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Mender

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article creator contested PROD. Non-notable recent open source software that fails WP:GNG. I wish there was more that I could say about it, but it just seems to be a small open source project. TonyBallioni (talk) 02:19, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - fails WP:GNG. MereTechnicality ⚙ 02:20, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete no mention of notability whatsoever, fails WP:GNG. Adamtt9 (talk) 02:38, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Added references to coverage by third parties at conferences as well as a third-party survey of embedded updaters. Also, try to google "embedded linux update" if you still have doubts of notability. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Xtreme2k14 (talk • contribs) 00:29, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary (talk) 07:07, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete -- the sources are weak, either being self-citations or Github, etc. Article is advertorially toned and the content belongs on the org's web site, not here. K.e.coffman (talk) 02:42, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Fails WP:GNG.CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 21:39, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.