Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miriam Mehadipur
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. postdlf (talk) 20:03, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Miriam Mehadipur (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:GNG, non notable person. Dusti*Let's talk!* 05:12, 25 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Israel-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:05, 26 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:05, 26 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:05, 26 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak keep per WP:BARE and WP:BEFORE. A quick look at Google News and a Yahoo search finds lots of potentially good sources. For example, her art is in the Saatchi Gallery, K and C Gallery, Cuentos Fnd., and she has had an exhibit in Woodstock, NY, Jerusalem Fine Arts, various Jewish community centers in NYC, etc. She's no Chagall, but she's exhibited in many famous art galleries and art colonies. That international exposure has been enough for notability of an artist. Bearian (talk) 17:07, 27 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Worth noting that Saatchi Online is an open-access website; not really the same as saying one's art is in the Saatchi Gallery (though I have encountered various people who say just that). AllyD (talk) 21:02, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 00:52, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Michaelzeng7 (talk) 19:25, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Question. No article in the Hebrew wiki is linked. Is there one? Zerotalk 15:06, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per Bearian. DavidLeighEllis (talk) 00:37, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.