Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miss Eco International
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Kurykh (talk) 18:47, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
- Miss Eco International (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Failed to meet WP:GNG. The article did not received significant coverage in multiple reliable sources with in-depth analysis of the pageant that are independent of the subject. Richie Campbell (talk) 13:00, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
- Delete: A google search indeed brings up remarkably little information. It seems like it is a best a very minor pageant. bojo | talk 13:30, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:54, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Beauty pageants-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:54, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Egypt-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:16, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:16, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
- Delete per WP:SNOW. Totally WP:MILL. Bearian (talk) 04:04, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
- Delete - doesn't meet WP:GNG. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 20:39, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.