Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MuslimMirror.com

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Daniel (talk) 12:31, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

MuslimMirror.com (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A non notable online website. The creator wants to promote it by creating a page here. fails WP:GNG. DMySon (talk) 10:49, 19 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Strong Keep It is one of the main news site of Indian Muslims. The websites has been quoted sufficiently by main stream media. The editor in Chief Syed Zubair Ahmad has been interviewed by various News papers on this project. Times of India, Hindustan Times, The Hindu and Indian Express have carried stories about Muslim Mirror. Penandpencil2021 (talk) 11:54, 19 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Penandpencil2021: Could you provide links to the stories about the publication? {{u|Sdkb}}talk 18:32, 19 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Sdkb:, please read How Muslim voices are breaking stereotypes online published by leading daily of India, Hindustan Times, They're demolishing Muslim stereotypes, a tweet at a time by Times of India and On Their Watch by Indian Express. These are top three leading English dailies of India which have given significant coverage to this news website due to its importance in covering issues related to under represented Muslim Minority community of India. The vernacular press also regularly takes its stories from Muslim Mirror. Penandpencil2021 (talk) 13:50, 20 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - @Penandpencil2021: Please indicate any conflict of interest you may have. The article appears to have been written with a view to pass our notability standards with a section called Notability. Please rewrite the article in a more objective manner. Jupitus Smart 18:36, 19 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Reply- User:Jupitus, there is no conflict of interest. I removed the heading notability. I don't want any undue praise for the subject. It's okay if someone edit it s required. Penandpencil2021 (talk) 13:50, 20 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.