Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Naresh Kanodia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Wifione ^Message 13:20, 26 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Naresh Kanodia

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Completely non-notable, despite the hyperbole in the writing. Reads as a promotional article by the subject, complete with what appears to be a press release. Leontopodium alpinum (talk) 05:11, 19 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2012 October 19. Snotbot t • c » 05:25, 19 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I suggest not to delete as He is well known Gujarati Actor and worked in many Gujarati Films mainly popular in rural audience. I suggest clean-up and reconstruction. --Nizil (talk) 13:13, 19 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Keep: After checking Google News coverages, I have absolutely no doubt on subject's notability. In Afd you are requesting copyedit? You may get some help in WP:GOCE. --Tito Dutta (talk) 15:10, 19 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:33, 20 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:33, 20 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:33, 20 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. The article may be poorly written, but a Google search confirms the subject is an ex-MLA, passing WP:POLITICIAN. A quick GNews search suggests he might also pass GNG. • Gene93k (talk) 01:36, 20 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.