Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/New Jersey League of Conservation Voters

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Despite the small amount of participation the consensus is perfectly clear. The "keep" reasons don't relate to any of Wikipedia's policies or guidelines. ("No indication that it doesn’t pass": see WP:BURDEN; "It’s not bothering you, is it?": see WP:HARMLESS; "if it doesn’t ... seem necessary": see WP:ITSIMPORTANT; "if it doesn’t get expanded": nobody has suggested that the article should be deleted because it's not big enough.) JBW (talk) 20:33, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

New Jersey League of Conservation Voters

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No indication that this local branch of the League of Conservation Voters passes WP:NORG in its own right, and I don't think a merge or redirect to League of Conservation Voters is plausible. AleatoryPonderings (talk) 23:24, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. AleatoryPonderings (talk) 23:24, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. AleatoryPonderings (talk) 23:24, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No indication that it doesn’t pass it either. It’s not bothering you, is it? Let it stay for a few weeks and if it doesn’t get expanded or seem necessary then we can re consider. Lima Bean Farmer (talk) 21:35, 3 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New Jersey-related deletion discussions. AleatoryPonderings (talk) 23:24, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom; the article reads as a way to promote LCV's endorsements in New Jersey, and there's no sign of independent coverage of that state's organization. power~enwiki (π, ν) 04:44, 7 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.