Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Newton (company)
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. ✗plicit 14:14, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Newton (company) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Most coverage seem to be small reviews driven by affiliate marketing, press release, etc. There's consensus that CoinDesk should not be considered to establish notability (see WP:RSP), and BetaKit coverage seems to be insufficient to meet WP:NCORP. MarioGom (talk) 20:34, 22 May 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Cryptocurrency, Finance, Companies, Internet, and Canada. MarioGom (talk) 20:34, 22 May 2022 (UTC)
- Info - Note to closer for soft deletion: This nomination has had limited participation and falls within the standards set for lack of quorum. There are no previous AfD discussions, undeletions, or current redirects and no previous PRODs have been located. This nomination may be eligible for soft deletion at the end of its 7-day listing.
- Logs:
2022-03 ✍️ create
- --Cewbot (talk) 00:02, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 00:04, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. No indication that this entity meets WP:NCORP. BD2412 T 21:59, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
- Delete There's a ton of references which are nothing more than promotional "See How Easy This Is" articles using screenshots and text largely available on the Newton website. Nothing that meets CORPDEPTH (in-depth info about the *company*, not how-to articles) and ORGIND. HighKing++ 12:53, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.