Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nicholas Suman

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. ✗plicit 14:48, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nicholas Suman

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails GNG with a lack of SIGCOV. Dougal18 (talk) 14:19, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Football, and Australia. Shellwood (talk) 14:56, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep – The player doesn't seem very famous outside of Australia, but he seems to have WP:SIGCOV in the country's sports media like the offline sources of The Press & Journal and Evening Express. Svartner (talk) 18:11, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 18:07, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep sufficient sources already present which show notability. Giant Snowman 18:10, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Sources indicate notability.Blethering Scot 19:02, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment All newly added sources either fail YOUNGATH or are routine transfer stories. Dougal18 (talk) 08:10, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Appears to be an easy keep. The player doesn't need to be world famous to be notable. Anwegmann (talk) 01:03, 30 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.