Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nick kemp

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. JForget 01:17, 9 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nick kemp

Signed to a contract with the Anaheim Ducks but has not played a professional game yet. Notability is asserted (as a professional hockey player) but not supported. May well play in the NHL at a later date...not notable yet. Frank | talk 18:26, 4 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Athletes-related deletion discussions. —LadyofShalott 18:58, 4 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ice hockey-related deletion discussions. —LadyofShalott 19:00, 4 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete he has not signed an NHL contract, he signed a contract with the Bakersfield Condors of the ECHL, who happens to be a affiliate with an NHL team. That is a far far stretch for notability IMO. —Krm500 ^{(Communicate!)} 19:51, 4 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, until he plays a game for a professional team (Bakersfield would suffice, according to WP:ATHLETE at least). He has yet to do that and he didn't win any notable awards as an amateur. Patken4 (talk) 21:47, 4 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Could not find a significant amount of coverage from reliable sources that would make him Notable. Mgmvegas (talk) 03:41, 5 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as subject is not notable as a hockey player per Hockey Notability Standards. When/If this player wins a major award or plays in a fully professional league, then this article can be recreated. As Patken4 said above, if/when he plays a game for Bakersfield, this article can be restored or recreated as he would have then played in a fully professional league, thus satisfying WP:ATHLETE. -Pparazorback (talk) 17:01, 5 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.